You folks are a joke. Toby would not have had HALF the yards he got against the SEC; keep California Dreaming. Ingram is twice the man and SEC is twice the conference.
D Klein - 14 years ago
Suh was by far the most consistent player this year...The Nebraska offense did him no favors..But when you look at stats for DT...his numbers are better than a lot of team totals combined..... i.e. Texas and Florida.....Suh should have won.. but there is no media in the middle of the US....or should I say "No intelligent media outside of the Midwest"....
Greg Olson - 14 years ago
Suh should have won, he changed the game for many offensive coordinators. They had to plan around Suh. Even running away from him and double or triple teams didn't always help. Suh in my opinion is the best player in college football this year. The offensive bias needs to stop and Big Suh should have been the one to do it. HIS numbers alone compared to the rest of the TEAMS should speak for themselves. Plus he is a squared away young man. Ingram is also a great player, but Big Suh would have stopped him cold.
Jerry ODell - 14 years ago
Stanford had four losses. If Toby had played a little better, they might have been unbeaten. Final win/loss record must be considered. Same for Suh, if he had turned up the heat, maybe maybe not. Ingram had a poor showing in the Auburn game but he didn't make mistakes (fumbles, penalties) and didn't lose the game.
jgc711 - 14 years ago
I don't have a problem with Ingram winning it but I thought Gerhart has better numbers than him and should have won it...
wasko - 14 years ago
Toby and Ingram where close I think and the tie breaker should have been that Toby was the senior.
You folks are a joke. Toby would not have had HALF the yards he got against the SEC; keep California Dreaming. Ingram is twice the man and SEC is twice the conference.
Suh was by far the most consistent player this year...The Nebraska offense did him no favors..But when you look at stats for DT...his numbers are better than a lot of team totals combined..... i.e. Texas and Florida.....Suh should have won.. but there is no media in the middle of the US....or should I say "No intelligent media outside of the Midwest"....
Suh should have won, he changed the game for many offensive coordinators. They had to plan around Suh. Even running away from him and double or triple teams didn't always help. Suh in my opinion is the best player in college football this year. The offensive bias needs to stop and Big Suh should have been the one to do it. HIS numbers alone compared to the rest of the TEAMS should speak for themselves. Plus he is a squared away young man. Ingram is also a great player, but Big Suh would have stopped him cold.
Stanford had four losses. If Toby had played a little better, they might have been unbeaten. Final win/loss record must be considered. Same for Suh, if he had turned up the heat, maybe maybe not. Ingram had a poor showing in the Auburn game but he didn't make mistakes (fumbles, penalties) and didn't lose the game.
I don't have a problem with Ingram winning it but I thought Gerhart has better numbers than him and should have won it...
Toby and Ingram where close I think and the tie breaker should have been that Toby was the senior.