Answers Logo
Search


Will you eat irradiated produce?

Sure, whatever. 51% (624 votes)

Oh, hell no. 49% (609 votes)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Total Votes: 1,233



rss
7 Comments
Adam
2008-08-22 11:12:53 ET

My fiancee' is a dietetics student; one of her professors put it best: "You can irradiate shit, but you're still eating shit."

Alex
2008-08-22 12:27:13 ET

I've been in the nuclear power industry for 10 years. Irradiating food does not affect taste, cellular structure or nutrition in any measurable way, which is the same as saying "not at all". It is ironic that the people most concerned about organic foods are the ones who would most benefit from food irradiation, given that their food is irradiated with raw manure rather than industrial fertilizers.
Some how, I suspect that's not what Adam had in mind with his comment, however.

Alex
2008-08-22 12:28:38 ET

Whoops. Should have been "fertilized with raw manure," not irradiated.

2008-08-22 14:44:34 ET

The 3 basic elements (phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium) which are industrial fertilizers are more healthy than the complex and living manure that these plants have evolved with for the past few million years? Nitrogen, which accounts for 56% of US fertilizer, is synthesized from natural gas and coal (http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/library/PRBpubs/prb0749-e.htm#fertilizer)

2008-08-22 14:48:33 ET

Ooops, I reread your post and mine and realized that it wasn't necessarily obvious why my point was relevant. Your point which seems to be that using manure is a more dangerous way to grow food compared to the safe fertilizers which come from chemical factories. My point above is the counter argument to that.

C. Funaro
2008-08-22 20:23:48 ET

Irradiation is not safe and is not proven to be without harm. See http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/11/05/food-irradiation-part-two.aspx
for more information about food irradiation. What is convenient and basically a CYA for the big food companies is not necessarily what is safe for the consumer.

Alex
2008-08-25 01:57:22 ET

-Your point which seems to be that using manure is a more dangerous way to grow food compared to the safe fertilizers which come from chemical factories.-

I agree you that manure is, if not necessarily superior, certainly more natural than using industrial chemicals as fertilizer. However, my point was simply that irradiation, being used to kill pathogens on produce that is generally eaten raw, would have the greatest benefit if it were used on organic foods that are literally sprayed with manure multiple times over the course of the growing season. Sadly, I suspect there isn't much of a market for organic, irradiated arugula among the Whole Foods crowd. :/

Funaro, you found an article that required registration to read so I skipped it, but I am familiar with the arguments against irradiation. A web search for "NIH, food irradiation" links to dozens of PubMed articles detailing decades long studies of the safety and efficacy of food irradiation. I'll take the published, peer-reviewed medical research studies over the Mercola article.


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet

Poll Author

Gawker Media is an online media company founded and owned by Nick Denton based in New Yo...

View My Previous Polls

My Website

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.