Answers Logo
Search

You can view polls created in the following languages.
English
German
French
Spanish
Dutch
Romanian
Norwegian
Portugese
Serbo Croatian
Arabic

When you first read Bill Kristol's "reporting" about Colin Powell's "convention appearance," you...



first evaluated it in light of Kristol's partisan leanings, and then evaluated it factually

first evaluated it factually, and then considered Kristol's partisan leanings.

Vote




5 Comments
Aug 14, 2008 2:23pm ET

Kristol is slime and if Ambinder is insinuating otherwise, he is slime, too.

Duvall
Aug 14, 2008 5:38pm ET

Need a choice for "first evaluated it in light of Kristol's extensive track record of being factally wrong about everything, and dismissed it accordingly."

Aug 14, 2008 6:09pm ET

Kristol doesn't have enough credibility left for me to bother with "evaluating" *anything* he says. He's the absolute worse kind of slime, spewing poison and fouling everything his name is associated with. Our country and our democracy deserve better.

Thank God I'm a Legacy!
Aug 15, 2008 12:53pm ET

Hey Ambinder, Kristol is paid propagandist. He's in the same realm of fiction peddling as Robert "Douchebag of Liberty" Novak. What in god's name has he gotten correct in the last 7 years. I mean really - this is a guy who tried to hitch his start to Dan freaking Quayle!

dB
Aug 15, 2008 2:55pm ET

Why would I evaluate his comments based on his partisan preferences, and not, say, based on the fact that he's a known liar with no journalistic credentials or integrity?


Poll Author

Marc Ambinder, an Atlantic associate editor, is blogging the 2008 presidential election ...

View all polls by this user


My Website



Results

Click on the link below to see the results of this poll.

View Poll Results