Answers Logo
Search


Should the city find a way to keep open Newton's branch libraries?



No! Voters knew the branches would close when they voted against the override

Yes! The branches add so much to the quality of life in our community.

I'm undecided.

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
3 Comments
2008-05-29 21:34:50 ET

We should, however, find a way to use the buildings. We've learned the hard way that selling city buildings usually leads to a need to purchase more expensive properties somewhere down the line. Better to use them for after-school programs, rent them out, or some other appropriate use.

Lisa Rucinski
2008-05-30 16:23:49 ET

This should not be an all or none question. Auburndale circulates about 23,000 books a year to Waban's 9,000. Waban and Newton Corner are the least used and should be closed. Auburndale and Nonantum are more used and should stay open. At the very least Auburndale should stay open since it serves the most people, houses the library book sales, and otherwise serves the community in many ways.

Joe
2008-05-30 21:45:36 ET

The good folks of Nonantum voted 80% against the Override. They don't want the library. They may say they do but their actions tell us they don't (or they want a library that cost $0 to run, well, it is time for some people to grow up--libraries cost money). If there is one branch to close, it is the Nonantum branch.


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet

Poll Author

Greg Reibman ...

View My Previous Polls

My Website

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.