Really? This story is worthy of multiple posts? I'm sure Ms. Douglass is a lovely person, but there are more important stories to cover, even in the inane horse race.
With all due respect to the docorum police with regard to this blog's comments, this is a really stupid (and stupidly loaded) poll question.
The majority of the choices involve "conspiracy" or "more" evidence of liberal media bias (who, other than the most conservative 20% of the country, believes this exists?)
How 'bout a poll for each and every one of the McCain campaign guys who are lobbyists, with questions for each one asking if it is "more" evidence that the political process is bought and paid for by 'big business' interests?
This line of argument is a slippery slope...........
Dark side, eh? Glad to see you are staying on top of this "story". Stay classy, Marc!
I agree ... most of Marc's poll questions are sharp, but this one is trivia. And the idea that the National Journal is a "liberal" media outlet is, um, pretty hilarious.
Email Address *
Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)
Name *
Your Website URL
Comment *
Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)
(Fields marked * are mandatory)
 |
Marc Ambinder, an Atlantic associate editor, is blogging the 2008 presidential election ...
Use the link below to share this poll.
You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.
Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.
