What do you think of Rihanna's cover?

6 Comments

  • Jon - 13 years ago

    If someone has to go as far as to strip naked for a Mag. Cover it just proves that they have no self esteem , career is sinking , badly need attention , so skanked out that no one wants to date her or take her home to meet parents , can't sing , isn't original and so on . I have no respect for a woman that feels the need to strip naked for the world to see ! In my book , these woman are scanks !

  • Alfred Rosenberg - 13 years ago

    The ugly truth is, white men dont find this attractive. I might one night stand it, if I was extremely drunk and it had a paper bag on its head. The whole purpose is to give an ego boost to blacks, which is the last thing on earth they need, they already think theyre the greatest. They see themselves as kings, queens and gods, the original man, the creators of Egypt etc. Next they will be telling us that Bernie Madoff is the sexiest man alive.

  • CMA - 13 years ago

    You all are stupid. She is hot as H***, if you say she ain't you are either blind or have no taste in woman.

  • JK - 13 years ago

    This is all death and it leads to nowhere. She will burn in Hell one day if she doesn't repent.

  • Bob - 13 years ago

    Let's be honest - she has tree trunks for legs and a thick behind. That cover was so photoshopped, it might as well have had her face on a white body.

  • Rob - 13 years ago

    There is no doubt Rihanna is sexy as hell, and the cover shot is very hot. The reason it is ridiculous is she was recently complaining about people always treating her like a sex object. As if ruuning around as scantly clad as she can get away with, people aren't supposed to address her as someone pushing sexuality. I am not some weird conservative or even religious, but it really makes me laugh my butt off. She does sexy to get attention, then complains about the attention. Too bad, and grow up girl!

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment