Coakley has been as lame an AG as you can get. Her handling of the "Big Dig" criminals is a perfect example of her work. She targeted the weakest link and let the responsible party walk. If it wasn't for the Feds, corruption in the State would have been totally ignored. She'll be elected by all the voters that don't pay attention. They'll vote for her for the same reasons they voted in Patrick and Obama. But she won't have my'n...
Mr. Wonderful - 15 years ago
Scott Brown is the man. That is strictly an unbiased opinion. He has a great track record, is a man of action not just talk.
Mr. Wonderful - 15 years ago
Scott Brown is the man. That is strictly an unbiased opinion. He has a great track record, is a man of action not just talk.
Wil Porter - 15 years ago
I am trying to figure out how a senator can make the people of any state "suffer" let alone "suffer immensely". Could you please provide a little more detail on this "suffering". Will we suffer more or less than having MIA senators ? Kerry while he was running for pres. i'm not sure did alot of voting and Kennedy when he was ill was of course limited in the way he could represent the people of MA.
Will either candidate cause more suffering and more embarassment than a Senate candidate who included in their foriegn policy experience the fact that they have a friend who lives overseas?
Will either candidate cause more suffering by requesting/mandating a law that they championed a few years ago be reversed ?
Will the people of MA suffer because we would now have a Senator that represents a growing % of the populus of MA and listens to their concerns.
(and no i am not talking about the GOP as we all know there is a small % of Repubs in MA, but there are a growing # of independents that are just not happy with the way the Dems have been running the House and Senate for the past 3 years. Yes the Dems were in charge of the House and Senate for the final 2 years of Bush's presidency)
So please .. any more information on this "suffering" would be greatly appreciated as I think we have all suffered alot and more suffering sounds like a bad idea.
Scott Brown is my choice --- because the Democratic leadership has done nothing for our State. Lets get some fresh ideas w/o giving the Democrates the majority and just pass anything that comes down the road.
Mike - 15 years ago
They all suck, but Steve Pagliuca and Scott Brown suck way worse than the others. If either of them were to win, the people of Massachusetts will suffer immensely.
Coakley has been as lame an AG as you can get. Her handling of the "Big Dig" criminals is a perfect example of her work. She targeted the weakest link and let the responsible party walk. If it wasn't for the Feds, corruption in the State would have been totally ignored. She'll be elected by all the voters that don't pay attention. They'll vote for her for the same reasons they voted in Patrick and Obama. But she won't have my'n...
Scott Brown is the man. That is strictly an unbiased opinion. He has a great track record, is a man of action not just talk.
Scott Brown is the man. That is strictly an unbiased opinion. He has a great track record, is a man of action not just talk.
I am trying to figure out how a senator can make the people of any state "suffer" let alone "suffer immensely". Could you please provide a little more detail on this "suffering". Will we suffer more or less than having MIA senators ? Kerry while he was running for pres. i'm not sure did alot of voting and Kennedy when he was ill was of course limited in the way he could represent the people of MA.
Will either candidate cause more suffering and more embarassment than a Senate candidate who included in their foriegn policy experience the fact that they have a friend who lives overseas?
Will either candidate cause more suffering by requesting/mandating a law that they championed a few years ago be reversed ?
Will the people of MA suffer because we would now have a Senator that represents a growing % of the populus of MA and listens to their concerns.
(and no i am not talking about the GOP as we all know there is a small % of Repubs in MA, but there are a growing # of independents that are just not happy with the way the Dems have been running the House and Senate for the past 3 years. Yes the Dems were in charge of the House and Senate for the final 2 years of Bush's presidency)
So please .. any more information on this "suffering" would be greatly appreciated as I think we have all suffered alot and more suffering sounds like a bad idea.
Scott Brown is my choice --- because the Democratic leadership has done nothing for our State. Lets get some fresh ideas w/o giving the Democrates the majority and just pass anything that comes down the road.
They all suck, but Steve Pagliuca and Scott Brown suck way worse than the others. If either of them were to win, the people of Massachusetts will suffer immensely.