It's ridiculous because the children are most injured by this virus. You need to be innoculated to be protected. I would never subject my son to that. What if purposely letting a child contract H1N1 made light of another illness he had and because he had it the virus killed him? Fools.
I completely understand the logic of a chicken pox party. Chicken pox has been around for generations, it is well understood by doctors, and the number of deaths per year is very low. However, to expose my child purposely to a virus like swine flu, which is more dangerous than chicken pox, is completely idiotic.
Reckless at minimum.
Email Address *
Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)
Name *
Your Website URL
Comment *
Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)
(Fields marked * are mandatory)
Use the link below to share this poll.
You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.
Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.
