Answers Logo
Search


Were Gadgets More Reliable 30 Years Ago?



Yes (any examples?)

No, gadgets are more reliable today.

Reliability is about the same.

I wouldn't know.

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
10 Comments
Normandy
2009-07-13 23:34:32 ET

Reliability would all depend on what we are talking about. Electronic gadgets, well no , my first intellivision died within a week, then I got a second one and it died 3 months later, then a 3rd and 4th, they always broke down.... Tv's always needed repairing, and new valves etc. Radios were fairly reliable. Washing machines.. and fridges lasted years and years. My Walkman was always breaking, and eating tapes. My Commodore 64 was reliable as anything (being all solid state), but the disc drives broke down every year (from over use). Kitchen appliances how ever, are more unreliable today than they were 30 years ago. I still have a toaster from 30 years ago that still works, and 30 year old tumble dryer still going!

So overall I'd say some devices were made well and others not so well.. not much has changed really.

Jake Chance
2009-07-14 00:11:58 ET

I had a microwave that's older than some of my friends. It still works. A two year old washing machine? Not so much.

2009-07-14 00:18:21 ET

Yes, mos def.
My dad built his entire basement into a showroom for 1960s-70s Soviet radios. ALL (100%) of them (about 200) work like they did the day they were manufactured.

2009-07-14 00:50:11 ET

If gadgets weren't more reliable 30 years ago, they sure were easier for an average handyman to fix. Re-string the tuning wheel and get your transistor radio working again. Today, a broken gadget that's not under warranty is instant junk.

Samantha
2009-07-14 01:46:30 ET

I think they are less reliable now. Things break a lot now, and most stuff is useless lead china crap.

me
2009-07-14 02:37:59 ET

Gadgets are much more complicated now then they were 30 years ago. This complexity results in easier to break and harder to fix gadgets. It's that simple..

2009-07-14 03:37:35 ET

I agree with "Me" above -- circuit boards are *massively* more complex and fit an astonishing number of transistors into smaller and smaller spaces.

Smaller = more delicate
more complex = more ways it can break down

So yeah, I'd say they were more reliable in the past.

Rod
2009-07-14 09:46:11 ET

30 years ago we didnt have the gadgets we have now, therefore they weren't more reliable

Crenor
2009-07-14 13:09:11 ET

Ahh, everyone forgets they all baught like 4 PS1's.
Or go way back, Celeco vision units would overheat and melt/stop working.
Games for the Comadore 64 and like computers - the disks would stop working all the time. Do you remember repair kits for your Nintendo games?

Some things seemed to last longer, some things did. We just have a lot more crap now then we used to. I bet the failure rate is about the same. Just the amount of things we have is a lot higher.

Ryan
2009-07-14 13:52:08 ET

I still cant find any material stronger than 1980's nintendium! That nintendo got thrown out a second story window and survived.



Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet

Poll Author

Gawker Media is an online media company founded and owned by Nick Denton based in New Yo...

View My Previous Polls

My Website

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.