BEYONCE HANDS DOWN
Since the jacket is ugly, it really don't matter who rocked it better. Both girls are pretty, but the jacket don't do either of them any justice....it might look a tab bit better on Ri-Ri simply cuz the cut of the jacket fits her body type better, but the jacket is nothing to gawk at.
Bee looks more sassy in it with the hot grey pumps and fab bag to match apose to Rhianna that has EVERYTHING on with the jacket not really showing it off. The jacket is HOT though!
Beyonce rocked it better, you can hardly see the jacket on Rih. And those boots Rihanna has on are nothing less then bent up and ran over!
Rihanna rock it 4real
wwwwwwhhhhhhhhhaaaaaatttttt!!!
rihanna?!!!??
hell naw..beyonce had it hands down. Rihanna did too much. bey kept it plain n simple. less is more!
Rihanna! The style, fit, and cut of the jacket is better suited for someone tall and slender. Boreyonce looks odd, something about the way she wears casual clothes is off.
As for Rihanna doing "too much", shades, hat, and scarf is what gives the look a chic appeal. Boreyonce is plain, nothing to it but to wear it blah.
Rihanna...
boreyonce is not her name hater and i love them both but beyonce wore it better hands down love her mucho mucho love you bee
its it who ever rocked it first rocks it best?
lol r u kiddin beyonce look simple but good. why is riri even up there?does she even have on the jacketlol. u can barely see it. maybe without the scarf.......but again these ladies have two totally different styles. i must admit riri can pull off almost anything. but b is still stylish no matter what she wears
Email Address *
Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)
Name *
Your Website URL
Comment *
Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)
(Fields marked * are mandatory)
ConcreteLoop.com first hit the net back in November of 2005. Created by Angel Laws as a ...
Use the link below to share this poll.
You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.
Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.