Answers Logo
Search


POLL #10. Computer programs like Snowie and GNU . . .



. . . have helped our game. They are superior resources for determining the best play.

. . . have hurt our game. They have reduced discussion by minimizing the value of expert opinion and eliminated proposition play.

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
2 Comments
Dan Pelton
2009-01-19 01:17:32 ET

The bots have definitely helped the game. The premise that they are hurting the game by minimizing the opinions of experts is faulty. There is a great deal of discussion of plays and bot rollouts of postions both at http://bgonline.org/forums/ and gammonu.com in the bulletin board and in the match against the readers.

Bots have also made in-depth study of positions, such as Backgammon Openings Book A and Classic Backgammon Revisited available. Prior to the "bot era", experts made long extensive manual rollouts to confirm their theories, but with bots long rollouts are readily available to even the newest players. Since the bots don't explain why they made a particular decision, expert opinions are still quite valuable in interpreting the results of bot rollouts. The bots have also not eliminated teachers or lessons from top players, for much the same reasons.

k.shino
2009-01-22 22:58:22 ET

question's term is not viable "which is more important water or air ? "


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet

Poll Author

chicagopoint.com is a prime source of backgammon information....

View My Previous Polls

My Website

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.