Answers Logo
Search


Should NYT Keep Bill Kristol or Bid Him a Fond Farewell



Yep, keep him coming

No Way! Good Riddance!

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
5 Comments
Doug Watts
2008-12-30 15:16:13 ET

Bill Kristol should go and here's why. He's a fraud as a conservative intellectual.

He was at worst the head cheerleader and master strategist behind the Sarah Palin disaster (making him 0 for 2 on Veep blockbusters, the first disaster being Dan Quayle) and at best her principal facilitator in the media (sorry Fred Barnes). Personal agendas should take a deep backseat to ideas if one is to be a thought leader, and Kristol uses his celebrity and his NYT platform primarily to advance his own standing. Good riddance. Keep David Brooks.

Blair Jones
2008-12-30 17:08:49 ET

God forbid we read an opinion that disagree with ours!

2008-12-30 18:52:10 ET

These results aren't surprising at all, given the closed-minded intolerance of the left, which permeates Fishbowl NY readership, and is exemplified by Ross' comment. Sarah Palin a disaster? She gave McCain most of the support he was able to muster and was a political success - no surprise given her phenomenal successes and popularity in Alaska. But a closed-minded liberal wouldn't see that; he or she would just see views he or she disagreed with and close down all cognitive processes.

Charles Giacometti
2008-12-30 18:57:38 ET

I often read opinions that disagree with mine, but Kristol is a fraud and an intellectual lightweight. Sometimes I think that the New York Times hired him (and the Boston Globe continues to publish the even more ridiculous Jeff Jacoby) as part of a conspiracy to make Republicans look like utter fools.

It reminds me of the great line from the first Back to the Future movie when Christopher Lloyd finds out Ronald Reagan becomes president in the 1980s. "And who is vice president, Howdy Doody?" Anyone who holds up Kristol as some great intellectual should be laughed out of town.

On top of everything else, Kristol is first and foremost a coward. He never served his country and yet cheerleads for war after war. If he had any character at all, he would hide in shame.

Roldo Bartimole
2008-12-30 21:29:43 ET

The problem with Kristol is that he obviously put no time and less thought into writing his column.

The Times has a higher standard than "phoning it in." And that, unfortunately, is what Kristol did time after time.

The space is too important to give it to someone who isn't even trying.


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet
rss

User

This user does not have a PollDaddy profile set up yet...

View My Previous Polls

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.