Answers Logo
Search


Are simple tests of a watchkeeper's alertness a good idea?



Yes

No

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
1 Comments
BB
2008-10-20 06:11:05 ET

As if I don't have enough things competing for my attention. The last thing you need in the wheelhouse is a device hectoring you every 5 minutes or so during the watch. What's truly necessary and preferable is a second individual in the pilothouse as a watch partner. Even if there are no words exchanged, another human presence is generally preferable to an alarm that is constantly going off. The natural tendency for the watch would be to silence the alarm permanently. The "ground guard function" of many chartplotters is one of many so-called aids that were well meaning but poorly executed. The alarm zone necessarily had to be set a good distance ahead and either side of the intended track but could not be set for use in narrow channels with any efficacy. The alarm zone would constantly note the shallows on either side of the track and sound endlessly. In doing so it would drive the watch crazy and distract it from more important issues, like looking out the windows. So, it would be unselected/disabled. What makes you think, human nature being what it is, that this alarm wouldn't be disabled as well?


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet
rss

User

This user does not have a PollDaddy profile set up yet...

View My Previous Polls

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.