Answers Logo
Search


What's your take on the new MacBook's lack of FireWire?



It's a really bad decision--FireWire is important for consumers and pros

It's okay for consumers, but pros still need FireWire, and will for years to come

Apple jumped the gun a bit: FireWire is needed now, but it's on the way out

Apple made a smart decision--USB is fine and FireWire is now superfluous

FireWire was always pointless

What's FireWire?

I think Macs should still have LocalTalk

No opinion

Other:

Vote

Share/Save/Bookmark
View The Results of This Poll



rss
2 Comments
Nate
2008-10-17 09:35:17 ET

Apple killed off FW400 for a reason. It lacks enough of an advantage over USB2 to matter to any "real" pros and to the majority of consumers. There's nothing stopping Apple from reinstating FW800 in future MacBook iterations, just as they initially dropped FW800 in the first MacBook Pro and then reinstated it in the next revision. If Apple plays its cards right, FW800 could kill off USB3 before it hits the ground.

Aion
2008-10-17 22:33:48 ET

If you use an external drive for backup, as most Mac users I know do, it's much better (faster) to use Firewire.

A great advantage of Firewire is the ability to boot into target disk mode; I don't know whether booting from USB will be supported.


Leave a comment

Email Address *

Your email address will not be published. (We add your Gravatar icon if you have one)

Please enter a valid email address below.

Name *

Please enter your name below.

Your Website URL

Comment *

Maximum of 4000 chars. (0/4000)

Please enter a comment below.

(Fields marked * are mandatory)


Submit Comment
Spam controlled by Akismet

Poll Author

I’m Harry McCracken, founder and editor of Technologizer. The site may be new, but I’ve ...

View My Previous Polls

My Website

Share Link

Use the link below to share this poll.

Embed This Poll

You can also place this poll on your website or blog as a widget. Simply copy and paste the code below into your HTML.

Alternatively, we now support oEmbed.